GuttenPlag Wiki
Registrieren
Untersuchte Arbeit:
Seite(n): 266, Zeilen: 23-32
Original:
Seite(n): 3, Zeilen: 1-9

So formuliert etwa W. Murphy treffend:

„A final definitional matter is important, especially for Americans who often assume that judges have a monopoly on constitutional interpretation. In fact, however, even in a constitutional democracy with a constitutional text and judicial review, all public officials sometimes interpret – and properly if not always conrectly so – the constitution. Not only judges but also legislators interpret when they resolve constitutional doubts for or against a bill as do executive officials when they decide they can, or cannot, consistently with their oaths of office carry out a particular Public policy. Even police officers engage in constitutional interpretation when they decide they can or cannnot arrest and / or search a suspect. Moreover, leaders of interest groups frequently offer

A final definitional matter is important, especially for Americans who often assume that judges have a monopoly on constitutional interpretation. In fact, however, even in a constitutional democracy with a constitutional text and judicial review, all public officials sometimes interpret - and properly if not always correctly so-the constitution. [8] Not only judges but also legislators interpret when they resolve constitutional doubts for or against a bill as do executive officials when they decide they can, or cannot, consistently with their oaths of office carry out a particular public policy. Even police officers engage in constitutional interpretation when they decide they can or cannot arrest and/or search a suspect. Moreover, leaders of interest groups frequently offer

Kategorie
KeinPlagiat
Im Literaturverzeichnis referenziert
ja
Übernommen aus
Murphy 2000
Link
Murphy 2000
Anmerkung
Zuerst wird ein Absatz aus der Quelle korrekt zitiert, die folgenden Absätze sind als Übersetzungsplagiat kopiert.